Hybrid and remote work isn’t an experiment anymore. In Australia, 46 per cent of employed Australians say they work from home at least some of the time, according to Roy Morgan’s survey of more than 41,000 people, July 2024 to June 2025. For nearly half the country, that’s just how work happens now.
What’s had less attention is what came along with it. Not the commute we lost. The people.
The number that stands out
The clearest study on this landed in June 2026, in the journal Science. Economists Natalia Emanuel (Federal Reserve Bank of New York), Emma Harrington and Amanda Pallais tracked more than half a million people across five large, nationally representative US surveys run between 2011 and 2024. Their finding: people in “remotable” jobs — the kind that can be done from home, like marketing or software — now spend 58 per cent more hours alone than people whose jobs can’t be. The odds of an entire day with zero human contact are up 72 per cent for that same group.
It sharpens again for people who work remotely and live alone: their odds of a completely contact-free day are up 83 per cent, and their reported mental distress runs roughly double that of people with more contact in their day. The researchers estimate remote work explains around a third of the overall rise in isolation and mental distress across the US workforce since the early 2010s. This is US data — nobody has run the equivalent study here yet — but work moving home and taking a slice of daily human contact with it isn’t something unique to one country’s labour market.
It’s not just less contact. It’s fewer weak ties.
Researchers draw a line between close friends and what they call “weak ties” — the barista who knows your order, the coworker from another team you chat to in the lift, the person two desks over who makes you laugh once a week. Individually, weak ties don’t feel like much. Collectively, they’re a big part of what makes a place feel social.
A 2021 study of 61,182 Microsoft employees, published in Nature Human Behaviour, found that when the company went remote, its internal collaboration network didn’t just move online — it fractured. Staff spent around 25 per cent less time collaborating across different business groups, communication shifted from calls and video toward email and instant messages, and new working relationships formed more slowly. The network became, in the researchers’ words, “less interconnected and more static and siloed.”
Two more figures point the same way. A 2023 SHRM survey of over a thousand US workers found 43 per cent of remote workers said they rarely have what SHRM calls “casual collisions” — the unplanned, in-passing conversations that used to just happen — against 20 per cent of people working onsite. And Gallup’s long-running workplace tracking found the share of under-35 workers who say they have a “best friend at work” fell from 25 per cent in 2019 to 20 per cent by 2022, the same years remote and hybrid work went from rare to routine.
Where Australia fits
Australia doesn’t have a remote-work-and-loneliness study to match the US ones yet. What it does have is a general trend moving in a similar direction. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s most recent analysis of the HILDA survey found 15 per cent of Australians reporting loneliness in 2023, and, separately, 15 per cent reporting social isolation — up from 13 per cent in 2019. That’s not proof remote work caused the rise; HILDA doesn’t run that comparison. But the years line up: the years isolation crept upward are the same years remote work stopped being unusual.
It sits alongside the wider figure from Ending Loneliness Together’s 2023 State of the Nation report — nearly a third of Australian adults report feeling lonely, from a survey of just over 4,000 people. We went through that report in full in an earlier note. None of this data proves a single cause. But it’s all pointing the same direction at once.
Calling everyone back to the office isn’t fixing it
The obvious response, for a lot of employers, has been to mandate more days in the office. McKinsey’s October 2024 survey of more than 8,000 employees across 15 US industries found the share of workers required in four or more days a week doubled in a single year, from 34 per cent to 68 per cent. Satisfaction didn’t follow the mandate, though. Fully remote workers reported around 90 per cent satisfaction with their arrangement, against roughly 80 per cent for hybrid and in-person workers — and how likely people were to be looking for a new job stayed about the same, whatever the policy.
Which suggests the problem was never really about the address. Sitting near people doesn’t automatically make you friends with them. It just makes it easier for it to happen by accident. Take the accident away, and putting everyone back in the room doesn’t automatically bring it back.
What people are already doing about it
Here’s the interesting part. People seem to be reaching for a fix on their own, without anyone telling them to. Research from Swinburne University of Technology found around half of remote workers now use a café at least once a week specifically as a “third place” to work from — not for the wifi, but for a mental reset and a sense of community. Ninety-eight per cent said they planned to keep doing it.
That’s the instinct in its rawest form: sitting somewhere with other people nearby, on purpose, because working entirely alone quietly wears on you. It’s just still mostly hopeful. You go to the café hoping the room feels a bit less empty. Nobody’s actually introducing you to anyone.
That’s the gap Flat White sits in. One person, matched for you, at a café, for an hour. Not a whole return to the office. Not another feed to keep checking. Just the part of the old workday that was quietly doing the most good — a conversation with someone you wouldn’t otherwise have met — made to happen on purpose instead of by accident.
Meet one person. Over coffee. On purpose.
Australia’s opening city-by-city. Join the waitlist at joinflatwhite.com →